Parthian Empire, Greater Armenia and Cappadocia in foreign policy projects of Mithridates VI Eupator before the wars with Rome

  • А. Hrehul Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Keywords: Mithridates VI Eupator, Pontic kingdom, Parthia, Armenia, Cappadocia, the Roman Republic, foreign policy

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to study the foreign policy of the Pontic king Mithridates VI (120–63 BC) during the preparation for the war with the Roman Republic. It is determined that the main tasks for the king were conquests of new territories and a search for reliable allies. The first important partner for Mithridates and a starting point for seeking further contacts was Parthian Empire. It is defined that the beginning of Mithridates’ VI political contacts with members of the Arsacid dynasty originates from the end of the 2nd century BC. Having been in an alliance with Parthia Mithridates Eupator intended to establish relations with Greater Armenia, which was in the sphere of influence and indirect dependence on the Arsacid dynasty.

It is investigated that the king of Pontus focused on the possibility of form an alliance with Greater Armenia, when the struggle against Rome for the control of Cappadocia began growing into an armed confrontation. Consequently, Mithridates VI succeeded his intentions before the first war with Rome. Moreover, Tigran was ascended to the throne through the contribution of Parthian king Mithridates II, so the rapprochement between Pontus and Armenia was organized by Parthia. An alliance with Greater Armenia helped Mithridates Eupator to subordinate Cappadocia. It should be emphasized that the origin of the family of the Pontic and Cappadocian kings from a single common descendant and the determination of the general core of the Pontic kingdom and Cappadocia, entitled «Pontic Cappadocia», became the reason for Mithridates’ VI desire to establish political control over the neighboring territory. Consequently, Mithridates VI tried to control the Cappadocia, which he considered as the original territory of his dynasty. Therefore, the dynastic struggle for the Cappadocian throne and the place in it of Mithridates VI were analyzed.

As a result of the study, it was determined that the feud over Cappadocia was one of the preconditions for the escalation of a war with Rome.

References

1. Thonemann P. Roman Phrygia: Culture and Society. Greek Culture in the Roman World. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2013. 326 р.
2. Reinach T. Mithridate Eupator, roi de Pont. Paris : Firmin-Didot et Cie, 1890. 494 p.
3. Olbrycht M. J. Subjects and Allies: the Black Sea Empire of Mithradates VI Eupator (120 – 63 BC). Pontika 2008: Recent Research on the Northern and Eastern Black Sea in Ancient Times : Proceedings of the International Conference, Kraków, 21 – 26 April 2008. Oxford : Archaeopress, 2011. Р. 275–281.
4. Olbrycht M. Mithridates VI Eupator and Iran. Mithridates VI and the Pontic Kingdom. Black sea studies 9: The Danish National Research Foundation’s Centre for Black Sea Studies / ed. by J. M. Højte. Gylling : Narayana Press, 2009. Р. 163–190.
5. Mayor A. Common Cause versus Rome: The Alliance between Mithradates VI of Pontus and Tigranes II of Armenia, 94 – 66 BCE. Tarihte Turkler ve Ermenile / ed. M. Metin et al. Ankara : Turk Tarih Kurumu, 2014. Р. 99–119.
6. А Greek-English Lexicon / ed.: H.G. Liddell, R. A. Scott. New York : Clarendon Press, 1901. 8 ed. 1802 р.
7. Chapouthier F. Le sanctuaire des Dieux de Samothrace. Paris: E. De Boccard, 1935. 97 р.
8. Manandyan H. Tigranes II and Rome: A New Interpretation Based on Primary Sources. Dearborn, Michigan : Mazda Publishers, 2007. 201 р.
9. Assar G. R. F. A Revised Parthian Chronology of the Period 165 – 91 BC. Electrum: Studies in Ancient History / ed. by. E. Dabrowa. Krakow : Jagiellonian University Press. 2006. Vol. 11. Р. 87–158.
10. Аssar G. R. F. A Revised Parthian Chronology of the Period 91 – 55 BC. Рarthica: Incontri di Culture nel Mondo Antico / ed. by. A. Invernizzi. Pisa, Roma: Istituti Editoriali e Poligrafici Internazionali. 2006. Vol. 8. Р. 55–104.
11. De Callataÿ F. L’histoire des guerres mithridatiques vue par les monnaies. Louvain-la-Neuve, 1997. 481 р.
12. Moghadam R. P. Study of Structure and Visual Features of the Parthian and Sassanid Coins. International Journal of Arts and Commerce. 2015. Vol. 4. № 9. Р. 140–153.
13. Смыков Е. В. Каппадокийская миссия Суллы: проблемы хронологии (историографический очерк). Studia historica. 2007. Vol. VII. С. 93–106.
14. Ballesteros Pastor L. Del reino Mitridátida al reino del Ponto. Orígenes de un término geográfico y un concepto politico. Orbis terrarum: Internationale Zeitschrift für Historische Geographie der Alten Welt. 2003 – 2007. № 9. Р. 3–10.
15. Габелко О. Л. К династической истории эллинистической Каппадокии: царский дом Ариаратидов. Античный мир и археология. 2009. Вып. 13. С. 92–119.
16. Dmitriev S. Cappadocian Dynastic Rearrangements on the Eve of the First Mithridatic War. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 2006. Bd. 55. № 3. Р. 285–297.
17. Gabelko O. Bithynia and Cappadocia: Royal Courts and Ruling Society in the Minor Hellenistic Monarchies. The Hellenistic Court: Monarchic Power and Elite Society from Alexander to Cleopatra / ed. by A. Erskine, L. Jones, S. Wallace. Swansea : Classical Press of Wales, 2017. P. 319–342.
Published
2019-12-29
How to Cite
HrehulА. (2019). Parthian Empire, Greater Armenia and Cappadocia in foreign policy projects of Mithridates VI Eupator before the wars with Rome. Zaporizhzhia Historical Review, 2(52), 197-201. Retrieved from https://istznu.org/index.php/journal/article/view/209